<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-bikes, co-creation, and Disraeli Gears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bicycledesign.net/2011/09/e-bikes-co-creation-and-disraeli-gears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2011/09/e-bikes-co-creation-and-disraeli-gears/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=e-bikes-co-creation-and-disraeli-gears</link>
	<description>The blog about industrial design in the bike industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Rider</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2011/09/e-bikes-co-creation-and-disraeli-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-24839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 04:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/?p=2561#comment-24839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, Disraeli Gears -- the photographs and history are spectacular, but the real draw is the writing.  Good stuff, James!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Disraeli Gears &#8212; the photographs and history are spectacular, but the real draw is the writing.  Good stuff, James!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick F</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2011/09/e-bikes-co-creation-and-disraeli-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-24834</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/?p=2561#comment-24834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who participated in the Quirky event (I was there as a framebuilder, though I don&#039;t usually work for Quirky) and is also neck-deep in the bicycle industry, I shared a lot of Yannig&#039;s thoughts about whether or not it was really a &quot;reinvention&quot; of the bicycle. Certainly there have been some concept bikes that look similar, and others that function in many of the same ways. (Non-concept bikes, too - the Air Friday came to mind.) Ultimately though, I think the question of whether or not this concept was was a true &quot;reinvention&quot; of the bicycle is somewhat moot. 

In reality, bicycles are reinvented practically everyday.... by people of vastly disparate credentials: students, designers, corporations,  random folks in their garages. A reinvention isn&#039;t tremendously substantive though until it moves beyond the concept phase.  As the many unproduced-yet-great designs that fill this blog illustrate... the crux of a new idea  is probably not it&#039;s relative merit, but whether or not it can be produced at a price point where people will buy it.  Bikes are a tough sell, and distilling a game-changing feature down to the point where someone will pay for it is where the real reinventions can happen.

I&#039;m not saying they should have had smaller goals because without question the entire event was about entertaining and engaging the public, and I feel it was a success in that regard. Whether or not they reinvented the bicycle remains to be seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who participated in the Quirky event (I was there as a framebuilder, though I don&#8217;t usually work for Quirky) and is also neck-deep in the bicycle industry, I shared a lot of Yannig&#8217;s thoughts about whether or not it was really a &#8220;reinvention&#8221; of the bicycle. Certainly there have been some concept bikes that look similar, and others that function in many of the same ways. (Non-concept bikes, too &#8211; the Air Friday came to mind.) Ultimately though, I think the question of whether or not this concept was was a true &#8220;reinvention&#8221; of the bicycle is somewhat moot. </p>
<p>In reality, bicycles are reinvented practically everyday&#8230;. by people of vastly disparate credentials: students, designers, corporations,  random folks in their garages. A reinvention isn&#8217;t tremendously substantive though until it moves beyond the concept phase.  As the many unproduced-yet-great designs that fill this blog illustrate&#8230; the crux of a new idea  is probably not it&#8217;s relative merit, but whether or not it can be produced at a price point where people will buy it.  Bikes are a tough sell, and distilling a game-changing feature down to the point where someone will pay for it is where the real reinventions can happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying they should have had smaller goals because without question the entire event was about entertaining and engaging the public, and I feel it was a success in that regard. Whether or not they reinvented the bicycle remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
