<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lots of unrelated links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bicycledesign.net/2010/11/unrelated_links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2010/11/unrelated_links/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unrelated_links</link>
	<description>The blog about industrial design in the bike industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mommus</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2010/11/unrelated_links/comment-page-1/#comment-17814</link>
		<dc:creator>mommus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/?p=1701#comment-17814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that oONDA bike looks a bit odd. When folded it doesn&#039;t look that different from a Brompton, but unfolded it looks a bit ungainly. Does it have stabilisers or something?
The Beast looks mental... but would be pretty awesome fun!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that oONDA bike looks a bit odd. When folded it doesn&#8217;t look that different from a Brompton, but unfolded it looks a bit ungainly. Does it have stabilisers or something?<br />
The Beast looks mental&#8230; but would be pretty awesome fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday bike roundup &#187; Cyclelicious</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2010/11/unrelated_links/comment-page-1/#comment-17608</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday bike roundup &#187; Cyclelicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/?p=1701#comment-17608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Another collection of goofy interesting bike designs. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another collection of goofy interesting bike designs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Allan</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2010/11/unrelated_links/comment-page-1/#comment-17018</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/?p=1701#comment-17018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strap an old starter motor to a bike with a regular car battery and it&#039;ll carry a rider at 40mph (for an hour) It&#039;s not rocket science.&#039;The Beast&#039; is appropriately named. How high is that bottom bracket? The trouble with using DH geometry as a design starting point is that it leaves the bike with an impossible to resolve compromise - difficult to pedal or too tall to get on. This isn&#039;t the first designer to make such a gaffe. And it wont be the last. Other niggles include the extra high rear suspension pivot point and that ridiculously high top tube. A triumph of style over content, with flaws like that I wouldn&#039;t trust that they&#039;d got the fundamentals right. .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strap an old starter motor to a bike with a regular car battery and it&#8217;ll carry a rider at 40mph (for an hour) It&#8217;s not rocket science.&#8217;The Beast&#8217; is appropriately named. How high is that bottom bracket? The trouble with using DH geometry as a design starting point is that it leaves the bike with an impossible to resolve compromise &#8211; difficult to pedal or too tall to get on. This isn&#8217;t the first designer to make such a gaffe. And it wont be the last. Other niggles include the extra high rear suspension pivot point and that ridiculously high top tube. A triumph of style over content, with flaws like that I wouldn&#8217;t trust that they&#8217;d got the fundamentals right. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
