<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xtracycle LongTail Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=xtracycle-longtail-standard</link>
	<description>The blog about industrial design in the bike industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eradler</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>eradler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/#comment-2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might agree but the problem is that you need an accepted form of disclosure. To my understanding both patenting and active disclosure needs lawyers....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might agree but the problem is that you need an accepted form of disclosure. To my understanding both patenting and active disclosure needs lawyers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/10/xtracycle-longtail-standard/#comment-2208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there any international standards for open source invention, similar to Creative Commons?  It seems to be a grey zone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m dissatisfied with patent law, it seems like patenting an invention is useless for small enterprise, because it pretty much just gives you the right to sue someone for infringement.  A large company can almost always outlast the little guy in court if they really want to steal an invention.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For many designs and inventions I&#039;d much rather do something like Creative Commons.  You can use it, hack it, modify it for non-profit purposes.  Hell for most things I don&#039;t care if someone else copies it for commercial purposes, just give the creator credit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The way I see it, by the time a large company is paying attention to something I&#039;ve designed, I&#039;m already two years ahead when it comes to my next idea.  Why waste energy fighting for the past when I can invest it in the future?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any international standards for open source invention, similar to Creative Commons?  It seems to be a grey zone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m dissatisfied with patent law, it seems like patenting an invention is useless for small enterprise, because it pretty much just gives you the right to sue someone for infringement.  A large company can almost always outlast the little guy in court if they really want to steal an invention.</p>
<p>For many designs and inventions I&#8217;d much rather do something like Creative Commons.  You can use it, hack it, modify it for non-profit purposes.  Hell for most things I don&#8217;t care if someone else copies it for commercial purposes, just give the creator credit.</p>
<p>The way I see it, by the time a large company is paying attention to something I&#8217;ve designed, I&#8217;m already two years ahead when it comes to my next idea.  Why waste energy fighting for the past when I can invest it in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
