I like the fact that Lemond express his opinion over comercial interests.

And what i like more is that his brand won´t be realated anymore with such an awful, shitty and crappy brand as trek…

MaLóL from http://www.light-bikes.net

I did just finish reading Landis’ book “Positively False”, and I enjoyed it. I was not convinced about Floyd’s guilt or innocence before, but the book does raise some good questions.

You seem to have a nice measured view of the doping business. Did you read David Walsh’s most recent, “From Lance to Landis”? There’s no smoking gun, so to speak, but certainly a lot of circumstantial evidence, and a lot of unanswered questions.

What do you think of Walsh

…i’m w/ you on the lemond/ trek thing…THAT relationship is just business & greg’s actions are counter productive to both his own & trek’s business…

…as far as the doping issue in cycling, i would better applaud lemond’s efforts if when pointing direct fingers, he used substantiated evidence…he ‘may’ be right about armstrong but simply creating controversy does two things…it makes greg look like he has his own hidden agenda & at a time when cycling’s already tarnished public image needs to be revised, lemond’s tactics are counter to both that end & his own stated wishes…

…all we’re provided w/ is a frustrating discourse between two celebrated, litigious “cycling personalities”…

…& a very nasally “hoh, hoh, hoh monsieur, eyou aare bust–ed regardement le professuer, ah oui ???”…

I could be wrong, but LeMond has not given me any compelling reason to believe yet