<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Burrows video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mike-burrows-video</link>
	<description>The blog about industrial design in the bike industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Burrows’ latest bike and other links &#124; Bicycle Design</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Burrows’ latest bike and other links &#124; Bicycle Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-3748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posted about Mike Burrows’ Ratracer VLR recumbent early last year. I’ve mentioned him on the blog a few times and have great respect for his work, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted about Mike Burrows’ Ratracer VLR recumbent early last year. I’ve mentioned him on the blog a few times and have great respect for his work, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have both books, mike&#039;s and bike science, and i really like mikes better. mike&#039;s book made me think and BS just made me wonder what the testing would show on new components.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but that&#039;s just me and it&#039;s great that both books are out there for us.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-mike-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have both books, mike&#8217;s and bike science, and i really like mikes better. mike&#8217;s book made me think and BS just made me wonder what the testing would show on new components.</p>
<p>but that&#8217;s just me and it&#8217;s great that both books are out there for us.</p>
<p>-mike-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikesgonewild</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>bikesgonewild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...burrows ratracer &#039;vlr&#039; is a great looking, well engineered &#039;bent...if you look at all the various bikes on bottlemasher&#039;s site, the ratracer looks to have the lowest center of gravity...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...love to ride one some day...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;burrows ratracer &#8216;vlr&#8217; is a great looking, well engineered &#8216;bent&#8230;if you look at all the various bikes on bottlemasher&#8217;s site, the ratracer looks to have the lowest center of gravity&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;love to ride one some day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice.. now we have a face for the enigmatic character of Burrows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.. now we have a face for the enigmatic character of Burrows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[54, I agree, Burrows work has always been fantastic. He designed several bikes for Giant, but the one you are probably thinking of is the mid nineties composite monocoque MCR. That was a beautiful frame, but the UCI didn&#039;t go for it. At least the UCI did decide to allow compact road frames based on the diamond frame. The compact road bikes that are all over the market today can be traced back to Burrows time at Giant not all that long ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>54, I agree, Burrows work has always been fantastic. He designed several bikes for Giant, but the one you are probably thinking of is the mid nineties composite monocoque MCR. That was a beautiful frame, but the UCI didn&#8217;t go for it. At least the UCI did decide to allow compact road frames based on the diamond frame. The compact road bikes that are all over the market today can be traced back to Burrows time at Giant not all that long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Id</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Id</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Burrows es Dios!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Burrows es Dios!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 54</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool, Burrows&#039; work had always been nothing short of fantastic....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Wonder what he is up to now?  He designed a bike for Giant once, before the UCI ruling, didn&#039;t he?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, Burrows&#8217; work had always been nothing short of fantastic&#8230;.</p>
<p>Wonder what he is up to now?  He designed a bike for Giant once, before the UCI ruling, didn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A F</title>
		<link>http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>A F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledesign.net/2008/01/mike-burrows-video/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anybody know about this site ( www.earthlab.com ) ?  I have seen other environmental sites with carbon calculators like yahoo and tree huggers, but I am wondering what the deal with earthlab.com is, is it credible?  I saw they also published a list last month of the top ten greenest cities  ( http://www.efficientenergy.org/Top-Ten-Green-Cities-in-the-United-States ).  Does anyone know if this site is better than say WWF site?  Fill me in &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I took their carbon foot print test and it was pretty interesting, but they said that I put out 4.5 tons of carbon while another test gave me like 15 tons?  I think I trust earthlab.com’s test a little more (because my score is lower).  Does anyone know about any other tests?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know about this site ( <a href="http://www.earthlab.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.earthlab.com</a> ) ?  I have seen other environmental sites with carbon calculators like yahoo and tree huggers, but I am wondering what the deal with earthlab.com is, is it credible?  I saw they also published a list last month of the top ten greenest cities  ( <a href="http://www.efficientenergy.org/Top-Ten-Green-Cities-in-the-United-States" rel="nofollow">http://www.efficientenergy.org/Top-Ten-Green-Cities-in-the-United-States</a> ).  Does anyone know if this site is better than say WWF site?  Fill me in </p>
<p>I took their carbon foot print test and it was pretty interesting, but they said that I put out 4.5 tons of carbon while another test gave me like 15 tons?  I think I trust earthlab.com’s test a little more (because my score is lower).  Does anyone know about any other tests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
